Preferential Semantics for Causal Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the present work we examine the causal theory of actions put forward by McCain and Turner [McCain and Turner, 1995] for determining ramifications. Our principal aim is to provide a characterisation of this causal theory of actions in terms of a Shoham-like preferential semantics [Shoham, 1988]. This would have a twofold advantage: it would place McCain and Turner’s theory in perspective, allowing a comparison with other logics of action; and, it would allow us to glean further insights into the nature of causality underlying their work. We begin by showing that our aim is not attainable by a preferential mechanism alone. At this point we do not abandon preferential semantics altogether but augment it in order to arrive at the desired result. We draw the following moral which is at the heart of our paper: two components — minimal change under a preferential structure and causality — are required to provide a concise solution to the frame and ramification problems.
منابع مشابه
A Unifying Semantics for Causal Reasoning about Action
One of the principal concerns in the research area of Reasoning about Action and Change is determining the ramifications of actions in changing environments. A particular tendency emerging in recent literature endorses the explicit incorporation of causal knowledge in logic-based action theories. It is argued that causal extensions not only enhance the expressive power of theories of action, bu...
متن کاملA Unifying Semantics for Causal Ramifications
A unifying semantic framework for different reasoning approaches provides an ideal tool to compare these competing alternatives. However, it has been shown recently that a pure preferential semantics alone is not capable of providing such a unifying framework. On the other hand, variants of preferential semantics augmented by additional structures on the state space have been successfully used ...
متن کاملPreferential Semantics for Causal Fixpoints
In this paper we concentrate on the causal theory of action developed by McCain and Turner 2] for computing ramiications. Our aim here is to characterise this theory of action in terms of a preferential-style semantics in the spirit of Shoham 4]. Such a result would not only place McCain and Turner's theory in a uniform setting, facilitating comparison with other logics of action, but also give...
متن کاملPreferential model and argumentation semantics
Although the preferential model semantics is the standard semantics for non-monotonic reasoning systems, it is not used for argumentation frameworks. For argumentation frameworks, instead, argumentation semantics are used. This paper studies the relation between the two types of semantics. Several argumentation semantics are related to additional constraints on the preference relation over stat...
متن کاملCausal Propagation Semantics - A Study
A unifying semantic framework for different reasoning approaches provides an ideal tool to compare these competing alternatives. A historic example is Kripke’s possible world semantics that provided a unifying framework for different systems of modal logic. More recently, Shoham’s work on preferential semantics similarly provided a much needed framework to uniformly represent and compare a vari...
متن کامل